Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Another God, Another Jesus

GOD CALLING GIVES BIRTH TO JESUS CALLING

"For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus,
whom we have not preached,
or if ye receive another spirit,
which ye have not received,
or another gospel,
which ye have not accepted,
ye might well bear with him."

(1 Corinthians 11:4)


A Report by Barbara Wilhelm
Part 1
I am aware that a great many people have found comfort from the publishing empire of books under the heading of Jesus Calling: Jesus Calling for Little Ones, Jesus Calling Bible for Children, Enjoying Peace in His Presence, Trusting in Christ, etc. In fact, there are well over 350 items listed in the online Christian bookstore site cbd.com under Jesus Calling. Obviously, many are so enthralled with this book that they have incorporated it into various aspects of their lives. Some of them are close friends of mine who have tender hearts, who love the Lord and who have read the books because they have desired a more intimate relationship with Him. I know that this report will, therefore, be difficult for them to read. Please know that it is written in love and deep concern for those who have read it. It took a very long time to write it as I struggled to write the truth in love. It also has taken a very long time to put this report in print. In actuality, this report started almost 20 years ago with a book called God Calling.

If you wonder what God Calling has in common with Jesus Calling, you need only ask Sarah Young herself. In a recent interview Sarah Young, author of the best-seller Jesus Calling, was asked the motivation for her initial dialoguing with God:
Question: How did you learn to "dialogue" with God?
My journey began with a devotional book (God Calling) written in the 1930's by two women who practiced waiting in God's Presence, writing the messages they received as they "listened." About a year after I started reading this book, I began to wonder if I too could receive messages during my times of communing with God…. I knew that God communicates through the Bible (and I treasure His Word), but I wondered what He might say to me personally on a given day. So I decided to "listen" to God with pen in hand, writing down whatever I sensed He was saying. Of course, I wasn't listening for an audible voice; I was seeking the "still, small voice" of God in my mind/heart. [Emphasis mine] 

Question: How awkward was it initially to begin a "dialogue" with God?
 

It felt a little awkward the first time I tried it, but I did receive a short message. The content was biblical, and it addressed themes that were current in my life: trust, fear, and closeness to God. [Source: http://www.cbn.com/entertainment/books/JesusCallingQA.aspx

LINK BETWEEN JESUS CALLING AND GOD CALLING
According to Sarah Young, God Calling was the motivating force behind Jesus Calling. For that reason this part of the research paper centers on the problems with God Calling. However, the research goes back even further to the root of God Calling and the leaders of the Buchman Group and the Oxford Group, Frank Buchman and A.J. Russell. Since this information is not of a nature that is normally discussed out in the open when the topic of Jesus Calling/God Calling is spoken of, it may be surprising to the reader. If you will bear with me, all this will come together at the end.

Researcher Marcia Montenegro described how Rev. Geoffrey Allen, a minister at Oxford University who became a leader in the Buchman Group, discussed the topic of "Godly" guidance:

The daily devotions in God Calling, written as though God/Jesus is speaking, came about in 1932 when two anonymous women decided to sit down with pencils and paper and wait to receive words from God. The claim is made in the Foreword by editor A. J. Russell that these two women received messages "from the Living Christ Himself." 

Andrew James Russell, editor of God Calling, had become a follower of Dr. Frank Buchman, who founded the Oxford Group, first started under another name in 1921, but taking the name of Oxford Group in 1931. Meeting in groups, this movement emphasized fellowship and receiving direct guidance from God. 

Russell writes that "I learned that it was a practice of the Group to keep a guidance-book and record in it those thoughts which came in periods of quiet listening to God." 

Although Russell writes that criteria were used to measure this "guidance," some of the criteria were quite subjective. Continually seeking guidance in this fashion, which is no different from automatic writing, is opening the door to false doctrine. [Source: https://ses.edu/jesus-calling-by-sarah-young-a-false-jesus. See also: http://www.christiananswersforthenewage.org/Articles_JesusCalling.html

I am fully aware how shocking it is to read that statement. It was equally shocking to me. Yet the more I researched, as you will see below, the more information I found that confirmed these facts.

Ed. Note: Automatic writing is an occult practice done by sitting still with a pen or pencil and paper (or at a typewriter or computer) and waiting to hear a message or voice originating from a source beyond the five senses. A friend attempted to practice this when she was in the New Age. This is how channeled books are written. "Automatic writing or psychography is an alleged psychic ability allowing a person to produce written words without consciously writing. The words are claimed to arise from a subconscious, spiritual or supernatural source." [See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_writing. Also see http://herescope.blogspot.com/2013/11/another-jesus-calling.html]

[Source]

PRACTICES AND HISTORY OF THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH GOD CALLING 
These questionable practices caused me to dig even deeper into the members of the Buchman Group and its connection to the two "listeners" of God Calling fame. I found a report in the CRI Journal that stated:

[A. J.] Russell, his book, For Sinners Only and his form of "guidance" are significant here. Louis Talbot stated that one "must examine writers such as A.J. Russell" and his book For Sinners Only to understand the Oxford Group…. 

In the January 1962 edition of The King's Business, Talbot wrote of the book:
When Russell's For Sinners Only was first published, it was denounced by churchmen as "deplorable" and "dangerous," but to me the worst thing about it was that it was not clear on the way of salvation.... The atonement was scarcely mentioned (p. 14). 
The Oxford Group also practiced the guidance method advocated by Russell and used by the Listeners. When William Irvine surveyed the opinions of other evangelical leaders on this method, he found them in one accord in their warnings against it (Heresies Exposed, third edition, p. 49). What was their concern? Pastor Harold T. Commins, who had been a former member of the Oxford Group, gave one response:
Finally, their idea of "guidance" is false to the Scriptures.... Sitting down with paper and pencil in hand and letting the mind go absolutely blank and then writing down whatever flashes across the mind as God's orders for the day is beyond anything promised or sanctioned in Scripture. Indeed this "passivity" of mind is a very perilous condition to be in for it is precisely at such moments that Satan gains control and does his devilish work (pp. 50.51)." [Source: https://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0021a.html
[A partial listing of A.J. Russell books from HERE]

This "guidance" is noted by another discernment author, who also connects this writing to the practice of a medium:

God Calling was supposedly written by two women who remain anonymous. They sat silently with pencils in hand and waited to get "guidance" such as Russell reported in his book For Sinners Only. In the preface of God Calling one of the "Listeners" tells how she was "curiously affected" by Russell's book. A growing and persistent desire to get similar guidance led her to arrange a quiet time with the friend with whom she was living. Whenever the woman tried to get guidance by herself, her efforts failed; but not so with her friend. She never received "guidance" unless the two were together, and then the messages were always communicated through the friend. Since Russell informs us that "not one woman but two have written this book," it appears "that the friend must have acted as a medium." [Florence Bulle, God Wants You Rich and Other Enticing Doctrines, p. 130] 

To bring this full circle, A.J. Russell was not only the author of For Sinners Only, the book that inspired the "Two Listeners" who wrote God Calling, but he was also the editor and publisher of God Calling, which went on to become the inspiration for Jesus Calling.

MEDIUMS 
Note the word "medium" in the above description by Bulle. What exactly are mediums? And how does the Bible view them? 
A medium is, literally, an "intermediary" between the spirit world and ours. The Bible condemns the practice of mediumship, and attempting to speak to the dead, through séances or other means, is expressly forbidden. Sometimes mediums are called "channelers," as they allegedly "channel" communication from the dead to the living. A medium might only communicate with one or more specific spirits (called "familiars" or "familiar spirits"), or the communication may be spread across many different spirits. The messages may come audibly, visually, or through physical sensations. [Source: https://www.gotquestions.org/what-is-a-medium.html
Deuteronomy 18:10-13 (NKJV): 
10 There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, 11 or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. 12 For all who do these things are an abomination to the LORD, and because of these abominations the LORD your God drives them out from before you. 13 You shall be blameless before the LORD your God. 
While the following Scripture may seem like a puzzling one to include in a discussion on God Calling, and subsequently Jesus Calling, it will, sadly, be seen to be very pertinent. As you read the verses, and the accompanying commentary and comments from a well-known discernment writer, Pastor Larry DeBruyn, I think you will understand why I have included the Scriptures. I am including two different Bible versions so that it is apparent that "familiar spirits" and "mediums" are used interchangeably.
Isaiah 8:19-20 King James Version (KJV): 
19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? 20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them. 

Isaiah 8:19-20 New International Version (NIV): 
19 When someone tells you to consult mediums and spiritists, who whisper and mutter, should not a people inquire of their God? Why consult the dead on behalf of the living? 20Consult God's instruction and the testimony of warning. If anyone does not speak according to this word, they have no light of dawn. 
It is wise to consult an established commentary to explain these passages. Each commentary in the website page cited is in agreement with the Barnes Commentary cited below.
That hath familiar spirits - Hebrew, אבות 'obôth. The word 'familiar,' applied to spirit, is… used by our translators to imply that they were attended by an invisible spirit that was subject to their call, or that would inspire them when they sought his direction…. The word is most commonly applied to women; as it was almost entirely confined to women to profess this power; Leviticus 19:31; Leviticus 20:6; 1 Samuel 28. Barnes Commentary [Source: http://biblehub.com/commentaries/isaiah/8-19.htm] 
The following is from world-renowned Bible teacher, Pastor Larry DeBruyn, as he comments on Isaiah 8: 19-20:

Isaiah recommends looking to God and the revealed Word rather than to necromancy. Isaiah returns, in ver. 19, to the consideration of his disciples. In the terrible times impending, they will have recourse to necromancy [ed., communication with the dead or spirit world]; he urges that they should look to God and the Law. Verse 19. - Seek unto them that have familiar spirits. In times of great distress the Israelites seem always to have been tempted to consult those among them who pretended to magic and divination. So Saul in the Philistine war resorted to the witch of Endor in 1Samuel 28. 

[M]ost of us never knew the Bible's explicit warnings that false Christs and false prophets would arise in our midst and seduce us with supernatural signs and wonders to make us think their teachings came from God. Those signs and wonders would be so convincing that "if it were possible" they would fool even the most faithful believers of the real Gospel and the real Christ. 
Helen Schucman

Some apparitions even claim to be "Jesus." Warren Smith's testimony recounts how he encountered a "false Christ" and "another Jesus" when he was a seeker in the New Age movement. He also relates how Helen Schucman heard an "inner voice" that said, "This is A Course in Miracles. Please take notes." The voice, which later identified itself as "Jesus," proceeded to dictate a body of material that completely contradicted the real gospel of Christ and whose oppositional teachings could only be characterized as "another gospel," "another spirit," and "another Jesus." (2Cor 11:4) [Source: http://herescope.blogspot.nl/2012/01/breached.html

Below is a copy of a letter I sent to a discernment editor I know, and her reply. It is the reason why some information was included in this report.
Dear Gaylene, 
In my regular reading in 1 Samuel yesterday I came upon the story of Saul and the witch of Endor. It dawned on me that the practice of communicating with familiar spirits is very similar to what occurs in God Calling/Jesus Calling. I don't believe the two "listeners" or Sarah Young are communicating with God. So I think the idea of communication with familiar spirits is a distinct possibility. 
Barbara 

Barbara, 
You are spot on. Pastor Larry (DeBruyn) did an in-depth article series a few years ago that touched on many of these things. Below is the conclusion to it. I've appended links to all of the parts in case you'd like to read them. Blessings, 
Gaylene 
Here is Larry DeBruyn's "Conclusion" that Gaylene had attached to her reply:

Conclusion: 
The warning is plain. There are false voices, impressions, experiences, prophecies, and signs and wonders that cleverly counterfeit themselves to be authentic-experiential encounters with the afterlife. These spiritual experiences can seem genuinely real, perfectly timed and intimately personal as they speak to our needs and comfort our hearts. But even as they may seem to meet our emotional and spiritual needs, we must acknowledge our vulnerability to spiritual deception and therefore measure these experiences by the full counsel of God's Word, all the while knowing that such encounters are unprecedented in and therefore unsanctioned by Holy Scripture, which reveals to human hearts the true work of the Holy Spirit (See John 5:39; 15:26). 

Dr. Harry Ironside, Pastor of Chicago's Moody Memorial Church from 1930-1948, emphasizes the fact that truth mixed with error results in "all error":
Error is like leaven, of which we read, "A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump." Truth mixed with error is equivalent to all error, except that it is more innocent looking and, therefore, more dangerous. God hates such a mixture! Any error, or any truth-and-error mixture, calls for definite exposure and repudiation. To condone such is to be unfaithful to God and His Word and treacherous to imperiled souls for whom Christ died.

"But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times
some will fall away from the faith,
paying attention to deceitful spirits
and doctrines of demons...."

1 Timothy 4:1, NAS 

This quote above is from Part 6 titled "BREACHED!" This entire article series deals particularly with the topic we are discussing in this report. I have included the remainder of the articles in this series by Pastor DeBruyn, which is titled Have Heart: bridging the gulf between Heaven and earth: A Review and Commentary, for your edification:

Read Herescope's Introductory Comments 
Read Part 1: Normalizing Necromancy 
Read Part 2: The "Canaanization" of the Church 
Read Part 3: Spontaneous Spiritualism 
Read Part 4: Interpretation by Imagination 
Read Part 5: Spiritualism's Slippery Slope 
Read Part 6: BREACHED! 

While I realize that all the above material is a great deal to take in, the words of Sarah Young herself lend them credence when she admits that the words she receives do not receive their inspiration from the Bible. The question has to be asked, therefore, where does her inspiration come from?
Sarah Young

Realizing (from page xii of Jesus Calling) that she is claiming that God speaks authoritatively through a source other than His Bible, Sarah Young cautiously amended her words: "I knew that my writings were not as inspired as Scripture is, but they were helping me grow closer to God." However, the Bible itself contradicts her by affirming that only the Words that go forth out of God's mouth - the Holy Scripture (Isaiah 55:11) - are inspired, and that "additional inspirations" are not even included in Scripture. Scriptures are not insignificant words to be used casually but are "quick and powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow and are a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart" (Hebrews 4:12).

Sarah Young cannot have it both ways. Either this is God the Son speaking in which case we had better listen because then these daily "guidances" or "inspirations" are equally as important as His Words in the Bible. Or, on the other hand, if this is not God the Son speaking, even in such a relatively insignificant way as compared to the Bible (which is what her quote implies), then why are we listening to these words at all?

Yet, as all the preceding material has stated, there is one other disturbing premise: what if this is not Jesus at all speaking? What if it is someone/something totally different speaking?

To be continued. . . .